brand

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. In the News
  4.  » 
  5. Press Releases
  6.  » Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. Secures Appellate Division Win For Owner, Preserving Rent Stabilization Exemption

Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. Secures Appellate Division Win For Owner, Preserving Rent Stabilization Exemption

rosenberg and estis

 

 


Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., prevailed recently in the Appellate Division, Second Department of the New York State Supreme Court in a dispute over whether New York’s rent stabilization law applied to a Brooklyn apartment building. The Appellate Division ruled that the building was exempt from rent stabilization, upholding an August 18, 2017, ruling by state Supreme Court Justice Peter Sweeney, Jr. of Kings County.

Jeffrey Turkel, a member of Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., represented the property owner and managing agent before the NYS DHCR, Kings County Supreme Court, and the Appellate Division, Second Department.

The dispute focused on whether the building was exempt from rent stabilization on the ground that it had been substantially rehabilitated as family units. The tenants prevailed before DHCR, at which point the owner and property manager retained Rosenberg & Estis. After the firm commenced an Article 78 proceeding, DHCR agreed to take the case back to consider the owner’s arguments. On July 22, 2015, DHCR reversed itself and found that the building was exempt from stabilization based on substantial rehabilitation.

The tenants, along with their tenants’ association, filed suit in Kings County, against the NYS DHCR as well as the owner and property manager. In August 2017, Justice Sweeney ruled against tenants and the tenants’ association. The tenants and their association appealed to the Appellate Division.

Appellate Division justices Mark Dillon, Sylvia Hinds-Radix, Hector Lasalle and Betsy Barros unanimously sustained Justice Sweeney’s decision. The Appellate Division justices held that the DHCR correctly determined based on the evidence before it that this building had been substantially rehabilitated, as the owner and property manager had asserted.

“This victory demonstrates that property owners must continually fight to preserve their rights,” Turkel said. “It is a powerful affirmation that through substantial rehabilitation, owners can free their buildings from rent stabilization.”

Share This